“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after some distance they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't imply that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous viewed.
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, endorsing a more informed and just society.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons possessing their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
3. I have listened to the figured out counsel for your parties and have gone through the record of this case with their ready assistance.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
Law professors traditionally have played a much lesser role in building case legislation in common law than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[four] and not formally amenable to establishing precedent, much in the exposition on the legislation in civil legislation traditions is finished by teachers somewhat than by judges; this is called doctrine and could be published in treatises or in journals which include Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common law courts relied tiny on legal scholarship; As a result, within the turn of your twentieth century, it absolutely was very rare to determine an instructional writer quoted inside a legal decision (except Maybe for the academic writings of well known judges including Coke and Blackstone).
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a chance of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law more info from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more
Case law, also used interchangeably with common regulation, is often a law that is based on precedents, that is definitely the judicial decisions from previous cases, relatively than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court inside the United States. Lower courts over the federal level include the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related for the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each state has its have judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is commonly referred to as being the “supreme” court, Even though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Though state courts might also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
The scrupulous reader could have noticed one thing above: a flaw. Further than the first 7 words, the definition focuses on the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 primary elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It can be properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition towards the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of the Pakistan Constitution supplies original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to just take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.